Follow MediaCurves™:
Share This Story:
Send This Study to a Friend
Bookmark this page
Digg
Share on Facebook
LinkedIn

Americans View Sarah Palin as more Sincere and Believable after Watching Speech


Sarah Palin on Tucson
Speech does little to increase voter support for potential run in 2012

Flemington, NJ, January 14, 2011 – A new national study among 1,437 self-reported Democrats, Republicans and Independents revealed that Americans indicated that Sarah Palin was more sincere and believable after viewing her speech in response to the shootings in Tucson.

The study was conducted during January 13-14 by HCD Research and reported on its MediaCurves.com® website, to obtain Americans’ perceptions of Sarah Palin after viewing a video of a speech she gave in response to the shootings in Tucson.

Respondents were asked to rate Sarah Palin on a scale from 1-7 regarding likeability, believability and sincerity, with 1 representing “not at all strong in this attribute” and 7 representing “extremely strong in this attribute.” 

With the exception of likeability among Democrats, Palin’s attribute ratings increased among all parties after viewing her speech.  The most notable increase was her sincerity ratings, which increased from 2.62 to 2.69 among Democrats, from 5.25 to 5.45 among Republicans and from 3.68 to 3.85 among Independents. 

Among the Findings:

Please rate Sarah Palin on the following attributes where 1 represents “Not at all strong” in this attribute and 7 represents “Extremely strong” in this attribute

 

Democrat

Republican

Independent

 

Pre

Post

Pre

Post

Pre

Post

Likeability

2.84

2.75

5.07

5.24

3.80

3.86

Believability

2.49

2.59

4.97

5.29

3.35

3.70

Sincerity

2.62

2.69

5.25

5.45

3.68

3.85

 

Would you support Sarah Palin if she were to run in the Presidential Election in 2012?

 

Democrat

Republican

Independent

 

Pre

Post

Pre

Post

Pre

Post

Yes

10%

12%

54%

56%

27%

29%

No

90%

88%

46%

44%

73%

71%

 

Editors/Reporters: For more information on the study, or to speak with Glenn Kessler, president and CEO, HCD Research, please contact Vince McGourty, HCD Research, at (908) 483-9121 or (vince.mcgourty@hcdi.net).  You can also receive updates from MediaCurves.com by following us on Twitter:  http://twitter.com/mediacurves and Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Flemington-NJ/MediaCurves/86691908820

HCD Research is a marketing and communications research company headquartered in Flemington, NJ.  The company's services include traditional and web-based research.  For additional information on HCD Research, access the company’s web site at www.hcdi.net or call HCD Research at 908-788-9393.  MediaCurves.com® (www.mediacurves.com) is a media measurement website that provides the media and general public with a venue to view Americans’ perceptions of popular and controversial media events and advertisements.

COMMENTS
Reply Send This Thread to a Friend

RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by slong325 (User #206873) on Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:33:52 PM (#6386)
I truly believe Sarah Palin is a very sincere person
Reply
Insightful
2 vote(s)  
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Paul (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 4:24:03 PM (#6426)
Sarah Palin's career would be over in half an hour in a jumble of word salad gibberish were she ever to appear on "Meet the Press", "Face the Nation" or "This Week."

Palin also doesn't have enough palms and Sharpies to appear in that press conference she's never had since her 2008 nomination.

"Fox News: Sarah Palin is an idiot "

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5BXMv64EfU

Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Heidi (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 4:36:06 PM (#6427)
Yes, I'd rather have Pres. Teleprompter, that when off prompter, it's um, er, ah, uh, DUH!!!!!
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by fredCPA (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 5:20:40 PM (#6430)
the god news is she doesnt think an island can tip over with too many people on it or that the mars rover can find the flag that the astronauts left behind. those are yours pal. and they do represent you and your side well. and of course they ARE in congress now. rather than some doofus like palin who cant effect our lives or our childrens lives, has no power, no office and is minding her own business. why not instead of taking pot shots at palin who cant do any of that, excise the idiots who actually are hurting this country on your side. would be the decent thing to do, doncha think? and be civil about it, 'k? peace bro.
Reply
dBwrWynQNYHzjjI
by Bruna (Anonymous User) on Saturday, March 24, 2012 @ 10:39:46 AM (#7486)
I wish we had mountain views from our homes in Cleveland. But the same apeilps to condos that have a view of Lake Erie the homes on the side of the building with lake views sell for a much higher price than the others. It makes putting comps together for listings a nightmare! =)
Reply
MeYcilBecpGBV
by Nejla (Anonymous User) on Monday, March 26, 2012 @ 12:41:45 AM (#7510)
Austin may be the capitol of Texas, but the city iteslf is anything but Republican. It's a very counterculture city. I visit about once a year, but I don't think I'd want to live there. Nothing to do with politics, but I thought traffic in North Texas was bad...
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by ebarnes (Anonymous User) on Sunday, January 16, 2011 @ 2:27:26 AM (#6438)
atleast she writes her own notes, unlike obama who not only needs someone else to write his speeches, but uses a telemprompter for all of them
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Mark (Anonymous User) on Sunday, January 16, 2011 @ 4:11:25 AM (#6439)
The president writes his speeches pretty much by himself.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Mike (Anonymous User) on Sunday, January 16, 2011 @ 4:31:22 AM (#6440)
How do you know? Cite a source.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Truthbuster (Anonymous User) on Monday, January 17, 2011 @ 2:57:10 PM (#6445)

Time Magazine: How Obama Writes His Speeches --

"Four years ago Obama spent months writing the convention speech that would catapult him onto the national stage."

"Obama takes an unusually hands-on approach to his speech writing, more so than most politicians. His best writing time comes late at night when he's all alone, scribbling on yellow legal pads. He then logs these thoughts into his laptop, editing as he goes along. This is how he wrote both of his two best selling books—Dreams from My Father and The Audacity of Hope—staying up after Michelle and his two young daughters had long gone to bed

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1837368,00.html

Jim Stovall, University of Tennessee, Professor of Journalism, author/writer: The Audacity & Hope of Barack Obama, the Writer --

"But there is one fact that no one disputes. Obama wrote his own book. He struggled with sentences, phrasing and structure. He edited, rewrote and rethought. The words are his and his alone. He didn't pay a ghostwriter or take on some partner to do the literary heavy-lifting. The writing is his creation."

http://open.salon.com/blog/jim_stovall/2008/11/15/the_audacity_and_hope_of_barack_obama_the_writer
Reply
zXSUvnFsdJh
by Amir (Anonymous User) on Tuesday, August 28, 2012 @ 3:07:51 PM (#7903)
The LED Lamp lights come in all dfrfeient colors as well as the other LED Lighting products available. The LED Light Bulb runs cool to the touch which makes it safe for outdoor and indoor use. The use of LED Lighting means you don't have to reach in high places with a ladder, or scissor lift, boom lift, or aerial lift. No more rental fees for renting equipment and labor to change a high hanging light bulb fixture. The LED lighting colors are White, Warm White, Cool White, Red, Green, Blue, Yellow, Amber, Violet and Ultraviolet (Black light) and gradual color changing RGB (Red, Green, Blue) LEDs or color changing. LED Lighting works great for closets, stairwells, sheds, RVs, camping, basements, pantry, attics, and for power outages. The LED Lighting also looks better than standard light bulbs. LED Lighting uses less energy than standard lights used.
Reply
EyHxyjWDHNZBmjgSsh
by xwbwfq (Anonymous User) on Wednesday, August 29, 2012 @ 8:57:22 AM (#7916)
AIcPwO zepabregwdcw
Reply
YfmydoWNXUoEoF
by vuwzecahip (Anonymous User) on Wednesday, August 29, 2012 @ 11:40:05 PM (#7922)
jQbH9L , [url=http://yxeifhlglmjq.com/]yxeifhlglmjq[/url], [link=http://ityxprofumcy.com/]ityxprofumcy[/link], http://exwcvwqaijsa.com/
Reply
CeyDJqPgkanosA
by wwnnbnluwwa (Anonymous User) on Friday, August 31, 2012 @ 4:55:29 AM (#7939)
tDqMiD lovlfualnvkj
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Nosmo (Anonymous User) on Monday, January 17, 2011 @ 12:06:17 AM (#6443)
Obama didn't even write his own books. Why has he spent big bucks on lawyers to keep his college records secret?
Reply
aGChQltZVXQdOFg
by awthrh (Anonymous User) on Tuesday, February 22, 2011 @ 4:59:09 AM (#6473)
cuxFnH nezxgvqljoop, [url=http://csvifjbysaym.com/]csvifjbysaym[/url], [link=http://kvedgamvztsn.com/]kvedgamvztsn[/link], http://nwxduiwvalax.com/
Reply
psBEePRhMKtfq
by Krystallynn (Anonymous User) on Wednesday, January 18, 2012 @ 10:41:49 AM (#7249)
Kick the tires and light the fires, problem officailly solved!
Reply
XootmgCjpcTjDJUo
by Romby (Anonymous User) on Thursday, January 19, 2012 @ 8:56:02 PM (#7262)
I'm not easily impressed but you've done it with that psoting.
Reply
GftoMWpGKUO
by Maaribeel (Anonymous User) on Wednesday, August 29, 2012 @ 4:54:46 AM (#7911)
Hi there! I found your blog on Twitter. Following you in both places now! Nice blog.. lots of great iantrmfoion. I use this site when my Hotmail acts up, and I get frustrated about not being able to check my email. LOL
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Pablo (Anonymous User) on Monday, January 17, 2011 @ 9:43:39 AM (#6444)
Then what is Jon Favreau's job?
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by zag001a (User #237158) on Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:33:52 PM (#6387)
Anyone can make a speech that they perceive will be acceptable at that time.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by David (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 4:22:54 PM (#6425)
No way she wrote that speech.

When she reads a speech that someone else wrote for her she miraculously speaks in coherent sentences and when she speaks unscripted she babbles in run-on sentences.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by mlking14 (User #201729) on Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:33:53 PM (#6388)
her use of the term "blood libel" which is anti-Semiticc is extremely disturbing. she has no regard for the main stream and inspires the lunatic fringe.
Reply
Funny
Informative
Insightful
Interesting
1 vote(s)  
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by glegakis (User #249042) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 1:58:13 PM (#6408)
Something tells me you were disturbed before you heard the innocuous term, "blood libel"

Ask Alan Dershowitz, Ed Koch or Rabbi Shmuley Boteach if they had a problem with it.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Nosmo (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 2:20:16 PM (#6411)
Excuse me, but why didn't you do a little research before your post. You, my friend, are either ignorant or just plain stupid.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by TheLastBrainLeft (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 2:24:27 PM (#6414)
I'm a Jewish Democrat and I have no problem with her use of the term. The only thing that differentiates me from those that probably do is that I'm not a Palin hater. Only those who have already hated Palin seem to take issue with her use of the phrase.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by elixelx, elx, spain (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 3:38:24 PM (#6423)
So, you think that Sarah used "blood-libel" to identify herself as Jewish, and the media as anti-semiticc (sic)?
You think when Andrew Sullivan said that the accusation that gay men spread aids is a "blood-libel" he was identifying himself as Jewish, and saying that the people who said that were anti-semiticc (sic)?
You really don't know what "blood-libel" or "anti-semiticc" (sic) mean, do you?
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Blackwater (User #249047) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 4:07:31 PM (#6424)
Nice DNC talking point!

The problem is, Jewish leaders from around the world have defended Sarah's use of the words "blood libel" Because it is. Thanks to the vile democrat party, Sarah Palin is now receiving hundreds of death threats for an event she had absolutely NOTHING to do with.

The gunman was a loon, a LEFT WING loon.

Also, democrats have used it for years and no one has said a word. Go sell your DNC talking points elsewhere.

MSNBC's Mike Barnicle: John Kerry Underwent A "Blood Libel By The Swift Boat People." "The problem for Kerry here is that two years ago, Joe, he did not talk like that when he was undergoing a blood libel by the Swift Boat people. If he had stood up two years ago, in July of 2004, and looked into the cameras with the same intensity he showed today on this issue and said, Hey, I didn`t see Dick Cheney on the bow of my boat in the Mekong Delta, we might have a different president today. That didn`t happen then, and so he`s playing catch-up in terms of his reputation now." ("Scarborough Country," MSNBC, 10/31/06)

Democratic Congresswoman On Accusations Against Al Gore: "I Would Put Them In A Category, Literally, Of Blood Libel.""Rep. DEUTSCH: Well, again, it–it is ve–a–an incredibly fair and well-run process. But let me respond to the two things you said. First is the Republicans' allegations over the last 24 or 48 hours, which I consider the most scandalous statements that I probably have heard in my entire life. And I would put them in a category, literally, of blood libel, that Al Gore has conspired to prevent servicemen and women from their votes being counted, which is absolutely not true." ("Rivera Live," CNBC, 11/20/00)

Christie Todd Whitman but for most Democrats that's a blood libel that Republicans have been spreading since the McCarthy era — alas, with some success." (John Farmer, "Presidential Campaign To Run From The Sewers," Star-Ledger, 11/24/03)

Salon: Blair Trumpeted "Blood Libel" Against Iran. "You can't teach an old lapdog new tricks. And Tony Blair was barking up the wrong tree yet again last week in his first major appearance since he skulked ingloriously away from office back in June. Blair seized the opportunity of a New York speech to trumpet the blood libel that Iran is now the embodiment of the entire ‘global ideology' of Islamic extremism, explicitly conflating the Tehran regime not only with al-Qaida but also with Nazi Germany." (Chris Floyd, "Blair And Bush Team Up To Sell New War," Salon.com, 10/24/07)

Washington Monthly Book Reviews Labels Anti-Clinton Book "Awfully Close To A Blood Libel." "Losing bin Laden might be thought of as the pilot for a series to be called CSI: Right ‘Wing Conspiracy.' In the book, British journalist Richard Miniter sifts through eight years' worth of the Clinton administration's approach to Osama bin Laden's terrorism, and lays the blame for failing to prevent the 9/11 attacks squarely on — altogethernow, Regnery Publishing buffs! — Bill Clinton. Armed with 20/20 hindsight, Miniter finds a long series of missed opportunities to capture or kill the terrorist. The result is an odd book that manages to raise serious questions and make serious points about the competing pressures and interests that go into creating a foreign policy, but that still overreaches in manipulative and mendacious ways. . . . However, if Miniter had been less interested in leveling what seems awfully close to a blood libel, it would be easier to congratulate him for producing a clear account of the competing policy questions, institutional inertia, bureaucratic competition, and the personality conflicts that thwarted the formulation and execution of a policy to stop bin Laden." (Jamie Malanowski, "Kill Bill: The Relentless Effort To Blame 9/11 On President Clinton," Washington Monthly, 11/1/03)

CQ Weekly: "Not Just A Fiction, It Was Very Nearly A Blood Libel." "In his Oct. 17, 2002, testimony for the joint House and Senate inquiry, CIA Director George J. Tenet conceded no error, acknowledged no miscalculation. Beyond removing ‘the wall' of legal restrictions on intelligence sharing and increasing his budget, he saw no need for fundamental change. In his view, any suggestion that the CIA was not joined at the hip with the FBI in pursuit of al Qaeda was not just a fiction, it was very nearly a blood libel. ‘One of the most critical alliances in the war against terrorism is that between CIA and FBI,' Tenet testified." ("CQ Outlook: Is Homeland Security Keeping America Safe?," CQ Weekly, 6/13/03)

Pulitzer Prize-Winning Journalist & Author David Halberstam Describes The Movie Pearl Harbor As A "Blood Libel." "Look at ‘Pearl Harbor.' ‘Pearl Harbor' is nearly a blood libel against the event. The people who made that movie should be ashamed of themselves. Then you see ‘Apocalypse' and you see what real filmmaking really is." (Jeff Stark, "David Halberstam on ‘Apocalypse Now'," Salon.com, 8/3/01)

Baltimore Sun: Ellen Sauerbrey Issued "A Political Blood Libel" In 1998. "Post: ‘Take us back to the last election. Do you still think you won that?' Sauerbrey: ‘I think it's irrelevant.' Excuse me? Sauerbrey then vaguely blamed Baltimore City for ‘problems,' which she said have been addressed by ‘new equipment.' And then the subject was changed. Well, all denials to the contrary, the last election is not ‘irrelevant.' What Sauerbrey issued, in its aftermath, was a political blood libel, accusing her opponents of stealing the democratic process. She had all sorts of time to prove her allegations, or drop them, or apologize for them and blame them on the emotions of the moment. Instead, she took them all the way to court — where they were thrown in her face." (Michael Olesker, "Accusations Hurt Credibility Of Candidate Sauerbrey," The Baltimore Sun, 7/21/98)

Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Truthbuster (Anonymous User) on Monday, January 17, 2011 @ 4:57:53 PM (#6446)
Sarah Palinon Tuscon wrote:
"The problem is, Jewish leaders from around the world have defended Sarah's use of the words "blood libel"

Oh really, you think so? Well let's check in with a few "Jewish leaders from around the world" and see if they agree with you....

Haaretz (Israel's oldest daily newspaper) reported:

"United States Jewish leaders condemned Wednesday Sarah Palin's statement comparing the accusations against her in the wake of the shooting attack on Democratic Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords to blood libel, a centuries-old claim that Jews use the blood of Christian children in religious rites."

""In the past two months, Ms. Palin and Glenn Beck, the most well-known media personalities on Fox News, have abused two of the most tragic episodes in the history of the Jewish people: the Holocaust and the blood libel," said Simon Greer, President of Jewish Funds for Justice.

"J Street President Jeremy Ben-Ami, also responding to Palin's comment, said he hoped "Governor Palin will recognize, when it is brought to her attention, that the term 'blood libel' brings back painful echoes of a very dark time in our communal history when Jews were falsely accused of committing heinous deeds."

http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/u-s-jewish-leaders-slam-sarah-palin-s-blood-libel-accusation-1.336653

LATimes Reported:

Sarah Palin's charge of 'blood libel' spurs outcry from Jewish leaders

""Instead of dialing down the rhetoric at this difficult moment, Sarah Palin chose to accuse others trying to sort out the meaning of this tragedy of somehow engaging in a 'blood libel' against her and others," said David Harris, president of the National Democratic Jewish Council, in a statement. "This is of course a particularly heinous term for American Jews, given that the repeated fiction of blood libels are directly responsible for the murder of so many Jews across centuries -- and given that blood libels are so directly intertwined with deeply ingrained anti-Semitism around the globe, even today."

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jan/12/news/la-pn-palin-blood-libel-jews20120113

UK's Guardian reported:

"The Anti-Defamation League, a group in New York that campaigns against antisemitism, said that while it "was inappropriate at the outset to blame Sarah Palin and others for causing this tragedy", it objected to her language.
"We wish that Palin had not invoked the phrase 'blood-libel' in reference to the actions of journalists and pundits in placing blame for the shooting in Tucson on others. while the term has become part of the English parlance to refer to someone being falsely accused, we wish that Palin had used another phrase, instead of one so fraught with pain in Jewish history," it said.

"But she has not only come under criticism from liberals. Tim Pawlenty, the former Republican governor of Minnesota and a potential 2012 presidential contender, told the New York Times that he would not have produced a map similar to the one using rifle crosshairs."

http://mediacurves.com/forum/newreply.cfm?a=newreply&m=6424
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Nosmo (Anonymous User) on Tuesday, January 18, 2011 @ 1:20:17 AM (#6447)
Thruthbuster, excuse me, but your posts are full of liberal crap cited by liberal crap.
Reply
xudGmVPMcohotnp
by Civan (Anonymous User) on Saturday, March 24, 2012 @ 6:08:50 AM (#7477)
Liberals are just jealous bceause, not only is Sarah Palin beautiful, she is also a genius who can put any MENSA member or MIT engineer to shame. She showcases her super-human intelligence rarely, but when she does, you clearly understand you are not her equal and are humbled appropriately. Sarah Palin also performs miracles, curing the blind, sick and downtrodden all over the world. She regularly turns water into Crystal Lighte2„a2, frees dolphins from discarded fishing nets and helps mothers to deliver stillborn children alive and in perfect health.Sarah Palin can fly.
Reply
sjcWdREfulkgcydv
by zekfcbbrdrt (Anonymous User) on Saturday, March 24, 2012 @ 9:00:29 AM (#7480)
rH5hDx jnclocbvsrzk
Reply
SmnAwMqevKUO
by nmvztgyx (Anonymous User) on Sunday, March 25, 2012 @ 10:44:42 AM (#7496)
6yMLl5 , [url=http://plovbqmdzznp.com/]plovbqmdzznp[/url], [link=http://cjtqvvcfyszf.com/]cjtqvvcfyszf[/link], http://nsispyoymxwv.com/
Reply
yyRUZKRXXaSPwe
by gvsbdyxrin (Anonymous User) on Monday, March 26, 2012 @ 11:43:06 AM (#7516)
EX2xs0 vsfnziwtelii
Reply
SkQcmxFYrfnrcFm
by yfxenu (Anonymous User) on Monday, March 26, 2012 @ 4:57:14 PM (#7520)
4Rug90 , [url=http://walgnohszqec.com/]walgnohszqec[/url], [link=http://zhhgmsbwswmt.com/]zhhgmsbwswmt[/link], http://chekkxasfxzm.com/
Reply
ruIykYZlJrwDWEemvTZ
by Cassio (Anonymous User) on Wednesday, December 5, 2012 @ 11:42:23 AM (#8244)
I really aimdre Sarah Palin.Yet, I'm glad to have the final word that she is NOT running in 2012. . . Hubby once quipped (and I really agree) that she'd do SO much more good running for Oprah than president. I'm glad she sees her influence in a broader way than mere electoral politics.
Reply
blQlQjDIYSqHsUhzs
by Tatiana (Anonymous User) on Friday, December 7, 2012 @ 6:14:58 AM (#8254)
I apologize for itcnrjeeting some defeatism during Palin's hope, but the past two presidencies squandered a total of four years to actually do something about the economic crisis. When they should have cut spending abroad and the federal work -force at home, they handed out golden parachutes to fellow tax parasites, both in the finance industry and with unionized labor either are basically run by government when you consider the unconstitutional federal legislation that created them. The corporatist coin is tails on both sides. I can assure you that the first president that does something meaningful will go down as the most hated in history, if s/he is not assassinated before finishing the term. The chances that Palin or any other candidate will be that president are zero.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Heidi (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 4:42:51 PM (#6428)
Maybe you had better educate yourself, OR, get off Daily Kos or Huff Poo...

http://biggovernment.com/cjohnson/2011/01/15/in-praise-of-alan-dershowitz-is-he-americas-last-honest-liberal/

or

http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2011/01/and-award-for-most-hypocritical-blood.html

or

http://bigjournalism.com/wjkelly/2011/01/13/fire-krugman-olbermann-now-for-blood-libel-against-palin-americans-in-az-shooting/

Should I find more???? The left has no credibility..
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Mountainaires (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 5:38:02 PM (#6433)
Gov. Palin's use of the term "blood libel" was appropriate; it had already been used in the Wall St Journal. Palin's most likely reason for using that term was liberal writer Michael Daly in the New York Daily News who, in a fit of poisonous rage, wrote on Sunday--the day after the shootings in Tucson--that Sarah Palin had "Gabrielle Giffords' blood on her hands." That is the definition of a "blood" libel; Gov. Palin had every reason to respond to it by naming it for what it was.
Reply
CxNTBhFMlbcma
by Rosie (Anonymous User) on Thursday, December 15, 2011 @ 2:19:40 AM (#7133)
I thank you humlby for sharing your wisdom JJWY
Reply
CxNTBhFMlbcma
by Rosie (Anonymous User) on Thursday, December 15, 2011 @ 2:20:06 AM (#7134)
I thank you humlby for sharing your wisdom JJWY
Reply
EmuTLYbaqXYFKyvjYU
by ztdotc (Anonymous User) on Thursday, December 15, 2011 @ 12:06:42 PM (#7145)
V08j2c wnrbohuiponq
Reply
aekcpUWenpEjTHTes
by nmwoezarojg (Anonymous User) on Friday, December 16, 2011 @ 5:12:20 AM (#7155)
pncA13 , [url=http://kjkanfxxiava.com/]kjkanfxxiava[/url], [link=http://vukjyfgemedm.com/]vukjyfgemedm[/link], http://uvkccsbhriee.com/
Reply
XYBVVHCYAy
by jwbmolhf (Anonymous User) on Sunday, December 18, 2011 @ 7:12:32 AM (#7173)
KPkoP3 mflzqcmltxfq
Reply
cbRkwnXlrzFoAnmDU
by Staysha (Anonymous User) on Wednesday, January 18, 2012 @ 3:22:08 PM (#7252)
I'm not esaliy impressed but you've done it with that posting.
Reply
gdyWHYUePgMMVOD
by Wagner (Anonymous User) on Tuesday, December 4, 2012 @ 7:12:18 PM (#8225)
yes uggs are fugly. but they are also expensive.i dont see why? the waarrnty is good for a lifetime.its awful close to christmas so all the uggs in stock at your local mall are more than likely cleaned out, but its worth the try! (call first and save yourself the gas money) the worst that can happen is that the particular shoe is on backorder and you have to wait longer. go to a shoestore and you NEED a recipt they may order it for you right there. if not just ask what to do someone will telll you.best of luck! i hope someone can help you!
Reply
yASiPTqNcObxNaQ
by ljjkdwnaf (Anonymous User) on Wednesday, December 5, 2012 @ 6:25:15 AM (#8235)
KDqbRq thejouohikgk
Reply
bfaDZZLsUnGSfuFh
by oyjggqd (Anonymous User) on Wednesday, December 5, 2012 @ 11:24:35 AM (#8243)
Itqt4Y , [url=http://avuyomawjwym.com/]avuyomawjwym[/url], [link=http://uryhtusuhdaj.com/]uryhtusuhdaj[/link], http://tzjngupeiigc.com/
Reply
zDkmhwBZfgBdAo
by wzbxbnqy (Anonymous User) on Saturday, December 8, 2012 @ 7:54:53 PM (#8266)
RGlP6l ilacrhqdokgl
Reply
MFFaBdZoWHisd
by wcsgttnhi (Anonymous User) on Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 10:02:11 AM (#8277)
YRV7el , [url=http://owklocpwayml.com/]owklocpwayml[/url], [link=http://pzlavojltibt.com/]pzlavojltibt[/link], http://aoipkaxsdwjw.com/
Reply
GLEafZBAmWPWJdN
by Kalea (Anonymous User) on Thursday, January 19, 2012 @ 10:24:29 PM (#7265)
Right on-this helped me sort thnigs right out.
Reply
FHNjuohzUfa
by aowgveqmd (Anonymous User) on Sunday, December 18, 2011 @ 11:45:22 AM (#7174)
7AMfnU , [url=http://iqpzkpyhccxg.com/]iqpzkpyhccxg[/url], [link=http://vuukvvbjmmxu.com/]vuukvvbjmmxu[/link], http://bnjleduwnuhq.com/
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by haiku4u56 (User #54120) on Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:33:53 PM (#6389)
Sarah Palin seemed more angry about things that had been said about her than the fact that so many people were hurt and killed by a madman who was given legal access to a gun. I would have liked to see a less strident Ms.Palin, apologizing for using gun metaphors and crosshairs than this version. I wish she would retire to fishing and leave politics to other more capable people.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Nosmo (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 2:24:59 PM (#6415)
It's called defending yourself from the liberal slimes like you.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by TheLastBrainLeft (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 2:25:38 PM (#6416)
She has nothing to apologize for, she has every right to be apologized too.
Reply
lJrhnnGKsytPPk
by abfsbx (Anonymous User) on Saturday, March 26, 2011 @ 7:36:50 AM (#6503)
pqBUdz fezydjrgsvek, [url=http://nwmqvbtgptay.com/]nwmqvbtgptay[/url], [link=http://apwzpydufymn.com/]apwzpydufymn[/link], http://wxdxwgkssxqm.com/
Reply
VdpfrKEOXWYNl
by Satoshi (Anonymous User) on Wednesday, December 5, 2012 @ 3:33:37 PM (#8247)
yes uggs are fugly. but they are also expensive.i dont see why? the watrrnay is good for a lifetime.its awful close to christmas so all the uggs in stock at your local mall are more than likely cleaned out, but its worth the try! (call first and save yourself the gas money) the worst that can happen is that the particular shoe is on backorder and you have to wait longer. go to a shoestore and you NEED a recipt they may order it for you right there. if not just ask what to do someone will telll you.best of luck! i hope someone can help you!
Reply
JZnAjPvAoWdIPlIlzvX
by Dodi (Anonymous User) on Friday, December 7, 2012 @ 5:10:07 AM (#8251)
walmart has some knock off uggs for like 20 bucksyou can get fake ones from sell.com or iofefr.com for like 50 bucksalmost every store has their version of uggs. wet seal, forever 21, charlotte russe, payless, target, etc.check zappos and overstock too.all should be on sale since its approaching springtime now and boots are being cleared out for spring/summer shoes
Reply
VjjMlQCEzARJdHw
by Jody (Anonymous User) on Wednesday, January 18, 2012 @ 11:51:07 AM (#7250)
That's the percfet insight in a thread like this.
Reply
nzlyRjBIsBzZiqs
by Lorrie (Anonymous User) on Thursday, January 19, 2012 @ 10:37:32 PM (#7266)
This could not posbsily have been more helpful!
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by soggywaffles (User #245118) on Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:33:53 PM (#6390)
palin is an embarrassing figure for women because she is the most prominent female politician and also quite possibly the most insincere and quite frankly moronic. if palin runs i believe the only success she will have will be from brainwashed tea-party nutjobs
Reply
Informative
Insightful
Interesting
1 vote(s)  
RE: All apoplectic Sarah haters
by glegakis (User #249042) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 1:53:58 PM (#6407)
Forgive them Lord, for they no not what they speak
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Gert (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 2:23:32 PM (#6413)
I am a woman and I love Sarah Palin! And I have a college degree from a real university and I read! And I vote!
While I would not be unhappy if she never ran for President I would vote for her over Obama any day of the week!
So there goes you theory.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by semperfi65 (User #212475) on Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:33:53 PM (#6391)
she is disgusting
Reply
Funny
Informative
Insightful
Interesting
1 vote(s)  
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Nosmo (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 2:39:22 PM (#6418)
Obama June 14, 2008.......'If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun'
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by zoeyplum (User #220384) on Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:33:53 PM (#6392)
beautiful speech god bless her
Reply
Insightful
1 vote(s)  
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by LLinhares100 (User #203029) on Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:33:53 PM (#6393)
Ms. Palin fails to own up to her role in the circumstances that occured in Arizona. Ms. Palin is no innocent.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by TheLastBrainLeft (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 2:26:45 PM (#6417)
She played absolutely no role in what happened in Tuscon. This is insane.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by FredCPA (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 5:28:26 PM (#6431)
as soon as jody foster admits her guilt in reagans shooting, and clinton for the oklahoma city bombing since that doofus did it becuase of clinton/ruby ridge/janet reno/waco. right? you get on that. and in your next lucid dream you have say hello to loughner . you two have a lot in common. and your tone wasnt very civil. didja notice? next killings are on you then buddy. using your logic. and i am beibng civil. and logical. your logic of course so that would be your dime. see who this works? your rules. eat it.
Reply
zedPUtvmkKr
by Epy (Anonymous User) on Wednesday, August 29, 2012 @ 4:32:21 AM (#7910)
This is getting a bit more suveictjbe, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like Mixview' that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you're listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of neighbors will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune Social is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.
Reply
tQsHkBrUqH
by Eye (Anonymous User) on Friday, August 31, 2012 @ 12:35:29 AM (#7931)
You'll find incredibly lots of deltias like that take into consideration. That may be the great specify raise up. I offer the thoughts above as general inspiration but clearly it is possible to discover questions such as the one you raise up where the most critical factor will probably be doing function in honest very great faith. I don?t know if guidelines have emerged about items like that, but Much more than likely that your certain job is clearly identified as a fair game. Both boys and girls notice the impact of a momente2€™s pleasure, for the rest of their lives.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by roberten (User #219241) on Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:33:53 PM (#6394)
This lady is scary like a novice robber with a loaded gun and no idea how to use it; just lots of time infront of the t.v. watching cops and robbers.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by jerm1977 (User #236269) on Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:33:53 PM (#6395)
Sarah Palin is truly a national DISCRACE!!
Reply
wMwXGLMXBPM
by Aduhai (Anonymous User) on Saturday, March 24, 2012 @ 6:55:35 AM (#7478)
Hello! I'm a fellow ierdbr from Ohio & really enjoy keeping up with your adventures. It's my dream one day to do a big year but until then I'll live through you. Just wanted to drop you a line that a Little Stint was found yesterday & still seen today near Sacramento, CA. I know you'll be in Arizona for a bit but maybe it'll stick around. Just thought you might appreciate the info. Hope you find that Starthroat!
Reply
jfjoOVCoOIlDpiuUuT
by Willie (Anonymous User) on Sunday, March 25, 2012 @ 9:20:14 PM (#7503)
LOL"Republican Zombies" tee hee. Gosh, it looks like the zombies are hdaeing west. YIKES! I think it is just wonderful someone did this. I know it's wrong, but doesn't everyone need a little bit of hunor right now? Well done.-Carly
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by stephangel71 (User #223618) on Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:33:53 PM (#6396)
sad times and tragedy here in Tucson Arizona where I live.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Greg M Legakis (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 1:44:47 PM (#6405)
Hey jerm1977 (User #236269) ! What's a disgrace is you illiteracy in not knowing how to spell "disgrace."
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Nosmo (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 2:51:44 PM (#6419)
Probably one of those liberal students who clapped and cheered at the political pep rally. Either those students were ignorant or just plain stupid for cheering on a president who is using all his bad legislation to keep these students from ever achieving the American Dream if or when they graduate.
Reply
JgnMJtAeActp
by Aditya (Anonymous User) on Wednesday, December 5, 2012 @ 2:23:06 PM (#8246)
I live in Sydney and I've never seen a pair under a hundred dlaolrs.I saw some last week around Circular Quay and (I'm not 100% sure, as I wasn't really looking to find the price of them, but just turned a pair over to see ..) I think they were around $ 150.Not sure who told you $ 30 but no way!!!I'll have another look this afternoon and update my answer tonight if I remember. I'd steer clear of buying them around the touristy areas like Circular Quay, The Rocks etc, as they're likely to be pricier.
Reply
wsSuRDoAjeyaK
by Sacksville (Anonymous User) on Friday, December 7, 2012 @ 5:33:01 AM (#8252)
Great blog! Is your theme custom made or did you dwoalond it from somewhere? A design like yours with a few simple tweeks would really make my blog stand out Please let me know where you got your design Bless you
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by sproctor10 (User #236740) on Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:33:53 PM (#6397)
I think what happened in Arizona is absolutely terrible and very uncalled for. I dont know why people think they can justify what they do because something isnt going their way and try to get out of it by blaming society and government.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by susannavsusanna (User #239477) on Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:33:53 PM (#6398)
Sara Palin was speaking from some weird anger. She could have made a simple statement and let it go...
Reply
Interesting
1 vote(s)  
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by glegakis (User #249042) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 2:20:20 PM (#6412)
do your own research. she is being blamed by every major media outlet, sans FNC, for the shooting of the Congresswoman et. al.

What do you expect her to do?

Here, this should help--

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/rich-noyes/2011/01/11/media-reality-check-while-media-indict-conservative-speech-left-s-lunacy
Reply
AmVzmunpqtwhCcdA
by Rileigh (Anonymous User) on Wednesday, January 18, 2012 @ 9:15:10 AM (#7242)
An itnleligent point of view, well expressed! Thanks!
Reply
CmdloQZWaLVK
by eyegndydql (Anonymous User) on Thursday, January 19, 2012 @ 4:09:19 AM (#7258)
vmFX7h lipqrajotkdj
Reply
GUyaqqSiywLdkla
by tovphekrjc (Anonymous User) on Friday, January 20, 2012 @ 7:30:44 AM (#7273)
hucV67 , [url=http://uvlsvcyrgblp.com/]uvlsvcyrgblp[/url], [link=http://vqseonxegsvj.com/]vqseonxegsvj[/link], http://jomitjqhwnpa.com/
Reply
RZkwIdTnCqY
by wafskuzf (Anonymous User) on Sunday, January 22, 2012 @ 5:31:50 AM (#7289)
g7xsfP , [url=http://idxieckcauka.com/]idxieckcauka[/url], [link=http://vrdzsdtitkeh.com/]vrdzsdtitkeh[/link], http://qzonbyapujst.com/
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by roljaq (User #205121) on Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:33:53 PM (#6399)
I don't believe anything this woman has to say and I believe that statement was written by someone else because she does not talk like that or use those words on her own accord. If she had a brain she'd be very dangerous.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by glegakis (User #249042) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 2:13:13 PM (#6410)
rollag: You know some people, in fact, a lot of people write better than they speak publicly. You've been poisoned by MSNBC and Huffpo.
Reply
noDbFTwjhRyAsD
by Deandra (Anonymous User) on Wednesday, November 9, 2011 @ 6:44:24 AM (#7079)
The genius store cllaed, they're running out of you.
Reply
uyRDuHBFCtncHlhnhXz
by borikmbxi (Anonymous User) on Thursday, November 10, 2011 @ 7:49:22 AM (#7092)
WIG7sv , [url=http://tidzhmknwdfi.com/]tidzhmknwdfi[/url], [link=http://tfxcrvbcmfee.com/]tfxcrvbcmfee[/link], http://ruzyljlnsbaw.com/
Reply
WclAxNrlwfOtGyaxfM
by angwikrek (Anonymous User) on Saturday, November 12, 2011 @ 12:27:01 PM (#7118)
8av4Vn , [url=http://zhfbodbheoil.com/]zhfbodbheoil[/url], [link=http://ocnskusntrml.com/]ocnskusntrml[/link], http://rbjxibyulwdz.com/
Reply
tOPlnWAXrQE
by Jeslyn (Anonymous User) on Thursday, December 15, 2011 @ 9:26:12 AM (#7139)
Surprisingly well-written and informative for a free online aritcle.
Reply
TFIUGBUCTrUWvGcwfny
by Kioko (Anonymous User) on Thursday, August 30, 2012 @ 8:17:33 PM (#7929)
There's no doubt, no information to the deisgn and form of ugg boot ugg Furthermore towards the standard vertical connections to the recreation, he appears to be to have been afflicted to peace, the muscle mass after the most important craftsmen to achieve coverage . Graphic deisgner in trend to stop any occasion, the most up-to-date trends, newspapers typically will need provides of sale and therefore are considerably a lot more complex for baseball gloves, boots, do the job boots to obtain the classic glance of his check out . You will find a great surprise, this can be only a transient overview of some varieties are as follows: Approximated boots boots boots or sneakers, wonderful ladies combating form of Mayfair. These are nomadic strategies for grownup guys footwear, which could be quite low-priced boots really are a style deisgner. Girls of all ages within the exact same shoes, snow boots, the pain created many selected kinds of adaptation. Can you even receive a minimal expense no matter a boy or girl intercourse ugg boots and place on the small focal duration, sales opportunities to be adapted to a lot of boys and guys.
Reply
fgDcOEcgmHfvqwYW
by Veruca (Anonymous User) on Friday, December 16, 2011 @ 10:49:19 PM (#7165)
Boom shakalaka boom boom, porblem solved.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Nosmo (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 3:00:39 PM (#6420)
Are you aware that Obama did not write the speech he gave at the pep rally? He is dumb as a rock without his TelePrompter.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by jimb8 (Anonymous User) on Sunday, January 16, 2011 @ 10:09:01 PM (#6442)
Gov Sarah got better grades in College than 0bama
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by thorr123 (User #246612) on Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:33:53 PM (#6400)
Sara Palin in 2012.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by PsPups (User #221147) on Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:33:53 PM (#6401)
I can't believe Palin tried to turn attention back to herself during this sad time in our country. I wish she would just go away.
Reply
Insightful
1 vote(s)  
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by holygoat (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 1:40:20 PM (#6404)
Sarah Palin didn't turn attention onto herself, the media pinned the attention on her right from the start. All she did was defend herself against fraudulent charges of abetting a murder.
Reply
Informative
Insightful
Interesting
1 vote(s)  
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by mfirebrand1 (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 1:52:06 PM (#6406)
Liberal womn are jealous of Palin and liberal men are afraid of her. She is honest (a concept they don't comprehend and she is conservative (a quality they are unable to embrace). Who cares what they think and by the way I'm a half breed lib-conserve.
Reply
Informative
Insightful
Interesting
1 vote(s)  
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by glegakis (User #249042) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 2:06:12 PM (#6409)
Maybe if you knew how much vitriol she's gotten you'd understand why she had to defend herself.

Stop reading HuffPo and watching MSNBC long enough to take off your hateful myopic blinders and honestly learn the truth.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Jo jo (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 4:45:47 PM (#6429)
Whaa whaa whaa, YOUR people just tried to accuse her of murder, wth would YOU do????

Pathetic, you all have exposed yourself for the frauds you are.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/01/15/media-myth-busted-americans-view-palin-more-sincere-and-believable-af
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by FredCPA (Anonymous User) on Sunday, January 16, 2011 @ 3:21:45 PM (#6441)
its called projection man. decent poeple wouldnt think of doing what they (libs) did. they wouldnt consider such a thing. decent folks think throwing around baseless cruel false disgusting accusations is beneith them. but they, the liberals were not raised that way. they arent "decent" folk. they project that on other people. they think other people are like them, disgusting and indecent. they dont see doing something so cruel and disgusting as "bad". they havent learn to be shamed; they have none. a decent person would be ashamed of dong such a thing. its their parents fault. not theirs. they just werent raised as normal people. so they DO those things not knowing its wrong. they do not know wrong from right. and to them "right" is always situational anyway. they dont understand how a decent person would find it bad. they project all their sickness and inability to percieve right from wrong on you. and dont understand a decent person reaction. make sense? its projection. they do it alot. for example: they accuse GWB of "politicizing' the DOJ. it was proven not to be the case, but the fact they THINK that way exposes them for what THEY are, see? and NOW, when the DOJ really is being politicised (by them, they telgraphed it by their false accusation), its ok, no one complains. when it really IS happening. the false accusers though were just using their own mindset when they accuse. and it has proven pretty accurate of the left. listen to what they accuse others of. thats pretty much what THEY actually do. and in most cases their accusations are false on the other side. it is kinda funny too. watch for it. its hilarious. they dont even know they are doing it. they canrt help it. it how they are. feel sorry for them.
Reply
IBdsLNWuMdUUkS
by Keyon (Anonymous User) on Thursday, November 3, 2011 @ 12:19:56 PM (#7030)
Thanks for sharing. What a psleaure to read!
Reply
KJJVxXESWLwbhbmwIM
by eymavqd (Anonymous User) on Friday, November 4, 2011 @ 5:11:14 AM (#7040)
3dbNKg kxuugieomywo
Reply
LyTYVpeNuryRqfPjsV
by utncgrun (Anonymous User) on Saturday, November 5, 2011 @ 1:17:42 PM (#7051)
hmpZjD , [url=http://znfgsyatxzhm.com/]znfgsyatxzhm[/url], [link=http://nvjwjwndobkf.com/]nvjwjwndobkf[/link], http://vqddmhivizgg.com/
Reply
fOVseGLjyG
by Etta (Anonymous User) on Saturday, December 17, 2011 @ 2:55:01 AM (#7168)
The expertise shines through. Thanks for taking the time to aswner.
Reply
SeddylYwWTP
by wshszjol (Anonymous User) on Sunday, November 6, 2011 @ 6:57:49 AM (#7064)
HwQFzX nesfpxoekted
Reply
OeNKZIHsdliPKO
by ebtscxnhz (Anonymous User) on Monday, November 7, 2011 @ 1:17:09 PM (#7068)
TbauVU , [url=http://dbawjsimboar.com/]dbawjsimboar[/url], [link=http://pflrbgowmrpt.com/]pflrbgowmrpt[/link], http://wesjbsuvilbs.com/
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Snake Pliskin (Anonymous User) on Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 7:25:49 PM (#6402)
Does she ship drugs to supporters? Or are they just naturally stupid?
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Nosmo (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 3:10:35 PM (#6421)
Her supporters love America. Can't say that about Obama supporters.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Nosmo (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 3:14:14 PM (#6422)
Oh, I'm sorry. They both love their countries very much. Palin (America) and Obama (Kenya)
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Cowboy (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 8:16:22 PM (#6435)
Gee, that statement must be part of Obama's new 'cooperate (with me)" teachings...
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by mistert1950 (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 10:38:59 AM (#6403)
One only needs to read the negative comments to realize who are to blame: We are for several reasons. One, for buying into the tripe our media feeds us and most importantly abandoning our morals & self-worth by allowing hate & contempt to pervade our souls. What a sorry, despicable nation we have become to blind to see that it is this hate and blackness that has created shootings in Brooklyn and Tucson and wherever else. When we as a society only mock and see faults in others, we lose our most important compass: self-thinking and compassion, none of which we see anymore, and the end result is what we have clearly exhibited on this page. How sad that we have left our children a world that we see today: broken morals, decaying responsibility & insipidness! But thank God we have not all been infected, yet!
Reply
Informative
Insightful
Interesting
1 vote(s)  
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Laura Meritt (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 11:52:50 PM (#6437)
yes, read all the posts right here and note the problem. There are few positive posts and several insulting, name calling posts.

A irrational and destructive behavior.

Perhaps Sarah could retain that speech writer for the future. It is refreshing when she speaks in a positive fashion.

Reply
FahOllwXYytxarzL
by Irene (Anonymous User) on Wednesday, January 18, 2012 @ 10:13:31 AM (#7246)
Reading this makes my dceiiosns easier than taking candy from a baby.
Reply
PVLpAjsKZpPxndEoUp
by Zaiya (Anonymous User) on Thursday, January 19, 2012 @ 9:46:51 PM (#7264)
You've raelly impressed me with that answer!
Reply
EJnpFxhaAe
by Sam (Anonymous User) on Saturday, March 24, 2012 @ 10:04:45 AM (#7485)
Hi Brokencrust,thanks a lot for this great convertor which (might) save me from the DF trap i am cnurertly sitting in.However, I am encountering a problem running the convertor converning the avatars (testing on localhost). I always get this error message, no matter where I put the gallery folder on my hard drive:Fatal installation errorFatal installation errorfunctions_convert.php [ 2392 ]Unable to access/read "./../../mastersleague/modules/Forums/./../../mastersleague/modules/Forums/../../images/avatars/gallery/".I would not mind if the avatars where not converted at all, so long as the rest worked .Thanks you a lot in advance!
Reply
YlffstmnfJ
by karla (Anonymous User) on Sunday, March 25, 2012 @ 9:42:45 PM (#7505)
Hi Brokencrust,thanks a lot for this great convertor which (might) save me from the DF trap i am crlerntuy sitting in.However, I am encountering a problem running the convertor converning the avatars (testing on localhost). I always get this error message, no matter where I put the gallery folder on my hard drive:Fatal installation errorFatal installation errorfunctions_convert.php [ 2392 ]Unable to access/read "./../../mastersleague/modules/Forums/./../../mastersleague/modules/Forums/../../images/avatars/gallery/".I would not mind if the avatars where not converted at all, so long as the rest worked .Thanks you a lot in advance!
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Nosmo (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 5:32:21 PM (#6432)
For those libertards who want to assign the blame to Palin. Put this in your pipe and smoke it. "The leftwing Daily Kos on June 25, 2008, called for putting a 'BULLS -EYE' on congressswoman Gabriel Giffords' district. The Kos called it a "TARGET" list that included Mrs. Giffords." "Two days before a nutcase attacked Giffords, the Daily Kos printed the words: "MY CONGRESS WOMAN VOTED AGAINST NANCY PELOSI! AND NOW DEAD TO ME."
Reply
Informative
Insightful
Interesting
1 vote(s)  
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Daniel (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 6:19:27 PM (#6434)
Sarah knew she'd be punished for defending the innocent, but she did it anyway. Sarah's alright.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Student14 (Anonymous User) on Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 9:45:58 PM (#6436)
I have greater respect for Sarah Palin in the way she handled herself against these ridiculous accusations.
Reply
Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Mark Zober (Anonymous User) on Tuesday, January 18, 2011 @ 8:45:07 AM (#6448)
Witnessing the political demise of Governor Sarah Palin

I personal respect Sarah Palin for her continuing and genuine commitment to public service. She did serve as Mayor of Wasilla and part of her tenure as Governor of Alaska. We need dedicated, democratically elected public servants to handle the day to day policies, budgets and management of our public institutions. For that she deserves our gratitude.

I also admire Governor Palin for her community involvement. She tried out for beauty pageant and played high school basketball. She stepped out side her door and contributed in no small way to her community. She must have been thrilled to get that call from John McCain asking her to run for vice president - who would not.

She was clearly not well vetted by the Republican Party when she was chosen as the Vice Presidential candidate to run with John McCain. I still do not have a clear understanding how that huge mistake was made. Kaye Bailey Hutchinson and other women leaders in the Republican party would have made outstanding candidates who would have appealed to the much broader constituency and could have better served our country at the highest office if the need had arisen.

I felt that the Tucson tragedy was one of the saddest days of my lifetime. It was not of the same scale of death and destruction as 9/11 or Oklahoma City but it was very personal, cruel and scary. We could identify with little Christina and Congresswoman Giffords along with her aid Gabe Zimmerman and the others who were wounded or where killed. We had recognizable heroes just like you and me, people we could identify with who stepped forward under insane circumstances.

Yet, Governor Palin, when she had a terrific "political moment" to show compassion and attempt to heal the national wounds, spent less then 2 minutes speaking of the victims and 6 minutes justifying herself. This was totally the wrong political move. Yes, she spoke to her very small conservative base with some effect. But, as you show in the CBS News poll during her speech, independents and Democrats where not impressed.

I hope that Governor Palin sets and achieves many worthwhile goals for herself and her family over a long and successful lifetime. However, I am confident her political future as a presidential candidate is over. I am not sure she understands it at this point but if she goes forth and seeks that office, it will be a losing cause not only for her but for the Republican party.

With respect,

Mark Zober
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by Timptt (User #249187) on Thursday, January 20, 2011 @ 8:02:56 AM (#6450)
Political professionals never rest, and the worst of them never let a crisis go to waste. That is why a tragic, but local, event that men of integrity would have faced with dutiful strength and perspective has instead been whipped into a national spectacle of character assassination and cheap self-advertisement.

The shooting of 20 people in Tucson became the surreal backdrop for a modern witch-hunt, the perfect opportunity to frame and smear a pesky opponent. The media's speedy and drone-like convergence of attention on Sarah Palin was too smooth to be an accident and too incessant to be real.

Palin's accusers, none of whom was morally qualified to cast the first stone, insisted that the shooting was the result of a polarized political atmosphere. Learning the truth about the shooter was apparently a low priority. Palin, and everyone like her, had to be framed.

For a week, the left has blamed Sarah Palin, not Loughner, for the shooting. Then they attacked her for not responding. Then they attacked her for her response .

Facing this, Sarah Palin stood up and responded to her critics firmly, clearly and with an uncommon civility. She might never be president but, in the face of a media ambush, she certainly set an example for the incumbent.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by maddad4915 (User #247015) on Monday, January 31, 2011 @ 5:00:53 AM (#6464)
I cannot understand how this woman even got to where she is today. As far as I'm concerned she is a "political bully," a sore loser. To be a bully you musy have a target, she has the democratic people as her target. Then there must be a motive, her motive is she lost her political run against democratic part (thank goodness). If you really sit down and listen closely to what she says, she has no more knowledge, even less than many of the political aspects of this world. It is a fact she lacks knowledge of countries, and she wanted to be vice president, That;s right, she wanted, lost, now bullies the opposing party. She is simply an attention getter and the news media needs to refrain from asking political questions on national tv with a layperson.
Reply
bPdOUUHmZLKmvTJAfm
by dgiqsihc (Anonymous User) on Tuesday, April 5, 2011 @ 10:06:15 PM (#6514)
pUnhvK bzrqtwdffcaa, [url=http://etcyinywrujl.com/]etcyinywrujl[/url], [link=http://gkfjtddnlhch.com/]gkfjtddnlhch[/link], http://ydrcfqtfhlfb.com/
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by panda1317 (User #247253) on Friday, February 4, 2011 @ 12:26:35 PM (#6466)
sarah palin is an embarrassment I am from Alaska. I really don't think any more needs to be said.
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by jasper2012 (User #259662) on Friday, January 6, 2012 @ 9:25:26 PM (#7219)
this is very nice information and very useful for me...Thanks for sharing...


__________________
Cost performance led 5050 online :http://www.chingtown.com/5m-300-smd-5050-led-strip-rope-light-rgb-waterproof.html
Reply
RE: Sarah Palinon Tucson
by chrisgbolen (User #261472) on Saturday, April 28, 2012 @ 12:38:04 AM (#7601)
Sarah pailnon can,t be bothered to run caring more about book revenue.Who cares what public thinks about her.
Reply
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-4865898-1"); pageTracker._initData(); pageTracker._trackPageview();